NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wise v Hottes Investments Australia Pty Ltd t/as Country Autos [2016] NSWCATAP 176 Hearing dates: 11 May 2016 Date of orders: 02 August 2016 Decision date: 02 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: P Callaghan SC (Principal Member) K Rosser (Senior Member) Decision: (1) The application for extension of time is dismissed.
(2) The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
(3) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL and APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL – Civil and Administrative Tribunal – no significant new evidence not reasonably available at time of proceedings under appeal – dismissed APPLICATION for extension of time for lodgement of Notice of Appeal – delay significant and insufficiently explained - dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 Cases Cited: Al-Daouk v Mr Pine Pty Ltd t/as Furnco Bankstown [2015] NSWCATAP 111 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Ferella v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2014] NSWCA 378 Jackson v NSW Land & Housing Corporation [2014] NSWCATAP 22 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Appellant: Robert Wise
Respondent: Hottes Investments Australia Pty Ltd t/as Country Autos Representation: Appellant: Ms Julia Anderson of Legal Aid New South Wales, Tamworth (by telephone)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate