NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Reid [2016] NSWCCA 151 Hearing dates: 22 July 2016 Date of orders: 04 August 2016 Decision date: 04 August 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] R A Hulme J at [56] N Adams J at [57] Decision: Crown appeal under s 5D dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal against sentence – doing an act with intent to pervert the course of justice – participating in the preparation of a false alibi and statement – s 9 bond imposed – whether sentence manifestly inadequate – Crown case consisting mainly of telephone intercepts – respondent an active participant in offence – respondent gave evidence in sentence proceedings – strong subjective case – sentence manifestly inadequate – residual discretion – custodial sentence would seriously interfere with respondent's rehabilitation – Crown appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – s 319 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – ss 5(1), 9, 21A(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – s 5D Cases Cited: CMB v Attorney General for NSW [2015] HCA 9; 89 ALJR 407 Khoury v R [2011] NSWCCA 118 Marinellis v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 307 R v Fahda [2013] NSWCCA 86 Regina v Giang [2001] NSWCCA 276 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina – Applicant Crown Aaron Joseph Reid - Respondent Representation: Counsel: Mr P Ingram – Applicant Crown Mr S Healy - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate