NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: FAL Healthy Beverages Pty Limited v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles Limited [2016] NSWSC 1058 Hearing dates: 27 July 2016 Date of orders: 03 August 2016 Decision date: 03 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Barrett AJA Decision: 1. Order that the statutory demand dated 30 March 2016 served on the plaintiff by the defendant be set aside. 2. Order that the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – winding up – statutory demand – application for order setting aside – whether genuine dispute about existence of debt – CORPORATIONS – statutory indoor management rule – entitlement to make certain assumptions in relation to dealings with company – disentitlement in case of suspicion that assumptions not correct. Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Correa v Whittingham [2013] NSWCA 263; 278 FLR 310 Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 Queensland Bacon Pty Ltd v Rees [1966] HCA 21; (1966) 115 CLR 266 Spacorp Australia Pty Ltd v Myer Stores Ltd [2001] VSCA 89; 19 ACLC 1270 Category: Principal judgment Parties: FAL Healthy Beverages Pty Limited (P) Manly Warringah Sea Eagles Limited (D) Representation: Counsel: Mr MLD Einfeld QC & Mr T Buterin (P) Mr DAC Robertson (D)
Solicitors: Colin W Love & Company Lawyers (P) Unsworth Legal Pty Limited (D) File Number(s): 2016/121400 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate