NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Valsamakis v R [2016] NSWCCA 156 Hearing dates: 1 March 2016 Date of orders: 04 August 2016 Decision date: 04 August 2016 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Hall J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [203] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against sentence granted (2) Appeal dismissed Catchwords: SENTENCE – Conspiracy to import a commercial quantity of border controlled precursor (ss 11.5(1) with 307.11(1) of the Criminal Code (Cth)) – rolled-up offence involving five importations – applicant a customs officer and as such had responsibilities in detection and prevention of alleged cross-border activity – bribery of a Commonwealth Public Official (s 141.1(3) of the Criminal Code (Cth)) – Official Abuse Office to Gain Advantage (s 142.2(1) of the Criminal Code (Cth)) – parity – differential charging of co-offenders – hierarchy of offenders within charged conspiracy offences – no marked disparity in respect of sentences imposed – whether discount on sentence allowed for co-operation with law enforcement authorities – assessment in sentencing for nature and ongoing severity of imprisonment – protective custody – objective seriousness – sentences imposed not manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: England v R; Phanith [2009] NSWCCA 274 FS v R [2009] NSWCCA 301; 198 A Crim R 383 Green v R; Quinn v R [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Haouchar v R [2014] NSWCCA 227 Jimmy v R [2010] NSWCCA 60; NSWLR 540 Khoury v R [2011] NSWCCA 118; 209 A Crim R 509 Lewins v R [2007] NSWCCA 189; 175 A Crim R 40 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] 189 CLR 295 R v Chandler; Chandler v R [2012] NSWCCA 135 R v Henderson [2014] QCA 12 R v Joseph Sukkar [2006] NSWCCA 92; 172 A Crim R 151 R v Lamella [2014] NSWCCA 122 SL v R [2015] NSWCCA 30 SZ v R [2007] NSWCCA 19; 168 A Crim R 249 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Apostolos Valsamakis (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: M Ramage QC (Applicant) L Crowley (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate