NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: BFD Pymble Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2016] NSWLEC 1315 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 04 March, 07 April, 20 April, 04 May, 30 June and 21 July 2016 Date of orders: 25 July 2016 Decision date: 25 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: BFD Pymble Pty Ltd (Applicant) Ku-ring-gai Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr M Jaukovic, Lin Tang & Co Lawyers (Applicant) Mr C Shaw, Swaab Attorneys (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00159352 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of Da No: 0145/15 for the demolition of all existing structures and the construction of three residential flat buildings, a neighbourhood shop and basement car parking at 2-8 Pymble Avenue and 2-4 Everton Street Pymble. 2. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 3. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 4. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 5. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application by substituting the following plans prepared as the plans relied upon for the purpose of the development application: Plan Reference Drawn By Dated S34-000 Cover Sheet (V) S34-005 Site Analysis (J) S34-010 Existing / Demolition Site Plan (G) S34-011 Proposed Site Plan (S) S34-100 Proposed Floor Plan – Basement 03 (Z) S34-101 Proposed Floor Plan – Basement 02 (Z) S34-102 Proposed Floor Plan – Basement 01 (Y) S34-103 Proposed Floor Plan – Lower Ground 02 (Y) S34-104 Proposed Floor Plan – Lower Ground 01 (Y) S34-105 Proposed Floor Plan – Ground (Z) S34-106 Proposed Floor Plan – Level 01 (Y) S34-107 Proposed Floor Plan – Level 02 (Y) S34-108 Proposed Floor Plan – Level 03 (Y) S34-109 Proposed Floor Plan – Level 04 (Y) SHED 31/05/16 S34-110 Proposed Floor Plan – Roof (Y) S34-400 Proposed Building Elevations (M) S34-401 Proposed Building Elevations (L) S34-402 Proposed Building Elevations (L) S34-403 Proposed Building Elevations (N) S34-404 Proposed Building Elevations / Sections (M) S34-420 Proposed Building Sections (L) S34-517 Diagrams – Waste Allocation (E) S34-524 Diagrams - Storage (E) S34-927 External Finishes Sample Board (D) S34-930 Photo Montage 1 (D) S34-931 Photo Montage 2 (D) LA-201 B – Landscape Concept Plan LA-202 B – Landscape General Arrangement Plan LA-203 A – Deep Soils Plan LA-204 A – Placemaking Diagram Turf 1/6/2016 LA-301 B – Landscape Levels Plan LA-401 A – Tree Plan LA-402 A – Planting Plan LA-403 A – Planting Schedule LA-501 B – Basix Complaince Diagram LA-701 B – Sections Turf 2/6/2016 LA-702 B - Sections C.01, C.02, C.03, C.04, C.10, C.11, C.12, C.13, C.14, C.15, C.16 (All Issue F) James Taylor and Associates 01.06.15 SW.01, SW.02, SW.03, SW.04, SW.05, SW.06, SW.07, SW.08, SW.09, SW.10, SW.11, SW.12, SW.13, SW.14, SW.15, SW.101 S34-528 Rev A, S34-528.1 Rev A, S34-528.2 Rev A, S34-528.3 Rev A SHED 01/07/2016
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate