Lindroos v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATAD 175

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lindroos v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATAD 175 Hearing dates: 16 March 2016 Date of orders: 04 August 2016 Decision date: 04 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J McAteer, Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision of the First Respondent to refuse to grant the licence is affirmed. (2) Pursuant to Section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the publication of paragraphs 16-33 (inclusive) of this decision (except to the second respondent) is prohibited Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Administrative review jurisdiction – Tattoo parlour licence – Fit and proper person – Confidential evidence - Public interest. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 Cases Cited: Smith v Commissioner of Police NSW Police Force and Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATAD 187 Austin v Commissioner for Fair Trading and Commissioner of Police NSW Police Force [2015] NSWCATAD 244. Deakin v Commissioner for Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAD 2 AJO v Director-General Department of Transport [2012] NSWADT 101 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Trent Lindroos (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police, New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H El-Hage (First and Second Respondent)