NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Anthony Glohe v Nicholas Simington (No 3) [2016] NSWDC 155 Hearing dates: 23 – 27 November 2015; 30 – 31 May 2016; 1, 7 June 2016 Date of orders: 12 July 2016 Decision date: 12 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Cogswell SC DCJ Decision: I enter a verdict for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $37,104. Catchwords: TORTS - negligence - road accident cases – road rage incident – liability of drivers of vehicles –pedestrian accidents – negligent if not reckless swerve towards pedestrian – altercation between passenger and driver of other vehicle – assessment of credibility – relevance of incomplete cross-examination of defendant due to defendant's medical condition – not a blameless accident – finding of no contributory negligence; DAMAGES – past-economic loss – limited work capacity for 12 weeks post-accident – future economic loss – reliance on Malec v Hutton principles – finding that plaintiff has ongoing and permanent loss in earning capacity – plaintiff is fulltime carer for wife – absence of medical evidence regarding the plaintiff's wife's life expectancy – award of buffer amount – past domestic care – failure to overcome statutory threshold – no award – future domestic care awarded – future out-of-pocket expenses awarded Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 Cases Cited: Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 8) [2005] FCA 1348 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anthony Glohe (Plaintiff) Nicholas Simington (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Toomey SC with Mr D Woodbury (Plaintiff) Mr P Ryan (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate