NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Austin v Commissioner of Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAP 179 Hearing dates: 15 April 2016, further written submissions on 26 and 29 April 2016. Date of orders: 04 August 2016 Decision date: 04 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: P Durack SC, Senior Member Dr J Lucy, Senior Member Decision: Leave to appeal refused. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL – decision to refuse tattooist licence – adverse security determination by Commissioner of Police - administrative review of decision- application of fit and proper test under Tattoo Parlours Act – criminal history and issue of rehabilitation – significance of outlaw motorcycle gangs - relevance of confidential criminal intelligence – appeal rights hindered by exclusion from criminal intelligence. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW). Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 (NSW) Public Health Act 1991 (NSW) Public Health Regulation 2012 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 Certain Lloyd's Underwriters v Cross [2012] HCA 56; (2012) 248 CLR 378 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Commissioner of Police v Sleiman & AVS Group of Companies [2011] NSWCA 21 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v NSW (No. 2) [1955] HCA 28; (1955) 93 CLR 127 Khan v Roads and Maritime Services [2014] NSWCATOD 23 Lal v Director-General Department of Transport [2001] NSWADT 74 New South Wales v Public Transport Ticketing Corporation (No 3) [2011] NSWCA 200 Singh v Roads and Maritime Services [2015] NSWCATOD 66 Smith v Commissioner of Police NSW, Police Force and NSW Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATAD 184 Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board (1979) 22 SASR 70 Zahra v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force & NSW Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATAD 211 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mathew Leslie Austin (Appellant) Commissioner for Fair Trading (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms Rao (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate