NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Pahuja v TCN Channel Nine Pty Limited (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1074 Hearing dates: 10 March 2016, 29 July 2016 Date of orders: 18 March 2016 Decision date: 05 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Publication of reserved reasons for refusing plaintiff's application to have parts of defence struck out; leave granted to plaintiff to use a document obtained during the course of the proceedings otherwise than for the purposes of the conduct of the proceedings Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defence of justification – application by plaintiff to have parts of defence struck out – whether particulars taken at their highest capable of establishing truth of imputations – principles relating to the provision of particulars in civil cases
PROCEDURE – obligation not to use a discovered document otherwise than for the purposes of the conduct of the proceedings without leave of the court – defamation action arising out of broadcast featuring secretly-recorded meeting between plaintiff, a migration agent and the agent's client allegedly made with the cooperation of the agent and without the knowledge or consent of the plaintiff or the client – where migration agent also a solicitor – application by plaintiff for leave to provide recording to Legal Services Commission for purpose of investigation of a complaint against the solicitor Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), s 25 Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld), s 705 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, r 21.7 Cases Cited: British American Tobacco Services Ltd v Cowell (No 2) [2013] VFCA 43; 8 VR 571 Brooks v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) 2015 NSWSC 1331 Gallagher v Destiny Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] WASC 475 Hayson v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 376 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; 35 CLR 125 Northam v Favelle Favco Holdings (Supreme Court (NSW), 7 March 1995, unrep) Rothe v Scott (No 2) [2015] NSWDC 143 TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Berrigan (Court of Appeal (WA), 17 June 1996, unrep) State of New South Wales v McCarthy [2015] NSWSC 1780 Rezaiee v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1656 Texts Cited: Isaac Newton, Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Sunhil Pahuja (plaintiff) TCN Channel Nine Pty Limited (first defendant) Nine Network Australia Pty Limited (second defendant) Ninemsn Pty Limited (third defendant) Jesse Grayson (fourth defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Smark SC (plaintiff) B R McClintock SC, M Richardson (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate