NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Westpac Banking Corporation v Allerton [2016] NSWSC 1076 Hearing dates: 26 to 27 July and 3 August 2016 Decision date: 08 August 2016 Before: Ball J Decision: 1. Judgment for the plaintiff against the second defendant for the sum of $1,249,424.82 (the Judgment Amount).
2. The second defendant pay interest on the Judgment Amount from the date of judgment up to the date of payment in accordance with s 101 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW).
3. The cross-claimant's/second defendant's cross-claim against the first cross-defendant/plaintiff dismissed.
4. The second defendant pay the plaintiff's costs on an indemnity basis. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – whether proceedings should be adjourned EVIDENCE – admissions – leave to withdraw admissions – whether withdrawal of admission inconsistent with case management principles GUARANTEE AND INDEMNITY – banker and customer – whether bank debited customer's account in excess of authority – accuracy of 'Dobbs' certificate COSTS – whether order for indemnity costs appropriate Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Dobbs v The National Bank of Australasia Ltd [1935] HCA 49; (1935) 53 CLR 643 Drabsch v Switzerland General Insurance Co Ltd, Supreme Court of New South Wales, unreported, 16 October 1996 Kyabram Property Investments Pty Ltd v Murray [2005] NSWCA 87 National Australia Bank Ltd v Hokit Pty Ltd (1996) 39 NSWLR 377 Shomat Pty Ltd v Rubinstein (1995) 124 FLR 284 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Westpac Banking Corporation ABN 33 007 457 141 (Plaintiff) Timothy John Allerton (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Hynes (Plaintiff) P Reynolds (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate