NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Settree (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1079 Hearing dates: 27 July; 3-4 August 2016 Date of orders: 04 August 2016 Decision date: 04 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: (1) Under s 38 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW), I return a special verdict of not guilty of the charge of murder of Margaret Settree by reason of mental illness; (2) Under s 38 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW), I return a special verdict of not guilty of the charge of murder of Ian Donald Settree by reason of mental illness; (3) Under s 39 of the Act, Scott Settree is to be detained in a correctional facility or at such other place as determined by the Mental Health Review Tribunal until released by due process of law; (4) I direct the Registrar to notify the Minister for Health of these orders; (5) I direct the Registrar to notify the Mental Health Review Tribunal of my special verdict and of these orders. The Registrar is to provide the Tribunal with a copy of these reasons, my orders, the transcript of proceedings for 3rd August, 2016 and the reports of Drs Samuel and Nielssen.
For the firearms charge:
Convicted of possessing an unauthorised prohibited firearm on 3 December 2014, contrary to the provisions of s 7(1) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW). Sentenced to a fixed term of full time imprisonment of 18 months duration, commencing on 3 December 2014 and expiring on 2 June 2016. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – offences against the person – murder – trial by judge alone – defence of mental illness – accused suffering from severe case of paranoid schizophrenia – accused did not understand wrongfulness of his act – finding of not guilty by reason of mental illness Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 18 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 104, 105, 107, 132, 133 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 60, 184 Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), ss 4, 7 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW), ss38, 39, 43(a) Cases Cited: Alford v Magee (1952) 85 CLR 437 at 466; Hawkins v The Queen [1994] HCA 28; 179 CLR 500; The King v Porter [1933] HCA 1; 55 CLR 182; R v Jenkins (1963) 64 SR (NSW) 20; R v McNaughton (1843) 8 ER 718; R v Minani [2005] NSWCCA 226; 63 NSWLR 490 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina Scott Settree (Accused) Representation: Counsel: E Balodis (Crown Prosecutor) E Wilson SC (Public Defender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate