NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hetherington [2016] NSWCCA 165 Hearing dates: 1 August 2016 Decision date: 22 August 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Button J at [2] N Adams J at [105] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) The sentence imposed in the District Court on 6 May 2016 is quashed. (3) The respondent, Paul Hetherington, is sentenced to a non-parole period of 1 year and 6 months to date from 6 May 2016. That will be followed by a parole period of 1 year and 6 months, which will expire on 5 May 2019. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal against sentence – armed robbery with a dangerous weapon – handgun – whether objective gravity of offence was at the lower end of the range of seriousness – whether the sentencing judge erred in use of sentencing statistics and comparable cases – whether it was open to find exceptional circumstances – whether sentence was manifestly inadequate – appeal allowed – respondent resentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 94, 97(1), 97(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 5, 50(1) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), ss 4, 4D Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW), Sch 1 Cases Cited: Bao v R [2016] NSWCCA 16 EF v R [2015] NSWCCA 3 Mulato v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v Readman (1990) 47 A Crim R 181 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina Paul Hetherington Representation: Counsel: D Kell with M Pulsford (Appellant) A Francis with A Chhabra (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate