NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rothe v Scott (No. 4) [2016] NSWDC 160 Hearing dates: 1 and 2 August 2016 Date of orders: 05 August 2016 Decision date: 05 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for $150,000. (2) Plaintiff's written submissions on interest and costs in 7 days. (3) Defendant's written submissions on interest and costs in 14 days. (4) Proceedings listed for further directions on matters of interest and costs on Thursday 1 September 2016 at 9:00am. (5) Liberty to apply in relation to interest and costs. (6) Exhibits retained for 28 days. Catchwords: TORT – defamation – defendant publishes Facebook post headed "Pedophile [sic] warning" naming the three motels owned and operated by the plaintiff in a small country town as being used to relocate paedophiles – plaintiff not named - whether plaintiff identified – whether imputations conveyed – extent of publication – defences of qualified privilege, honest opinion and triviality – damages –aggravated compensatory damages – judgment for $150,000 Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW) Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), ss 30, 31, 33, 34 and 38 Cases Cited: Cerutti v Crestside Pty Ltd [2014] QCA 33 Channel Seven Sydney Pty Limited v Parras [2002] NSWCA 202 Cole Myer Ltd v Webster; Coles Myer Ltd v Thompson [2009] NSWCA 299 French v Fraser (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1807 Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520 Mickle v Farley [2013] NSWDC 295 North Coast Children's Home Inc. trading as Child & Adolescent Specialist Programs & Accommodation (CASPA) v Martin [2014] NSWDC 125 Nowak v Putland [2011] QDC 259 Parras v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Limited (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Simpson J, 14 September 2001) Pedavoli v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1674 RJ v JC [2008] NSWDC 217 Rothe v Scott [2015] NSWDC 105 Rothe v Scott (No. 2) [2015] NSWDC 143 Rothe v Scott (No. 3) [2016] NSWDC 151 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Kenneth Rothe Defendant: David Scott Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Mr C J Dibb Defendant: Mr D Scott (in person)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate