NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Phillips v R [2016] NSWCCA 159 Hearing dates: 22 July 2016 Decision date: 10 August 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; N Adams J at [25] Decision: Leave to appeal refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – causing grievous bodily harm with intent – joint assault on victim – whether judge erred by not directing jury as to causation – whether verdict unreasonable because evidence incapable of establishing causation – where sole issue at trial was identification (recognition) – no error in failure to direct on matters not at issue in trial – leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 33(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 5(1) Criminal Appeal Rules r 4 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 191 Cases Cited: Alford v Magee [1952] HCA 3; 85 CLR 437 ARS v R [2011] NSWCCA 266 Huynh v The Queen [2013] HCA 6; 295 ALR 624 Papakosmas v R [1999] HCA 37; 196 CLR 297 Pemble v The Queen [1971] HCA 20; 124 CLR 107 R v Greatorex (1994) 74 A Crim R 496 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Richard Grant Phillips (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms A Francis (Applicant) Mr P Ingram SC (Crown)
Solicitors: Bannisters Lawyers Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2012/392603 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 18 December 2014 Before: Armitage DCJ File Number(s): 2012/392603
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate