NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by the Attorney-General in and for the State of New South Wales under the Evidence on Commission Act 1995 [2016] NSWSC 1086 Hearing dates: 08 August 2016 Decision date: 08 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 33(3) of the Evidence of Commission Act 1995 (NSW), Mr Sathia Ung of 9/88 Koonoona Avenue, Villawood NSW 2163 ("Mr Ung") is to be examined.
(2) A copy of this Order, the Summons and Affidavit in Support is to be served on Mr Ung with a Subpoena to Attend to Give Evidence.
(3) The Registrar of this Honourable Court is appointed as Examiner to conduct the examination of Mr Ung under rule 52.2 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005.
(4) The proceedings of the examination of Mr Ung are to transcribed and a copy for the transcription provided to the plaintiff. Catchwords: EVIDENCE ON COMMISSION – order for examination of a person sought under s 33 of the Evidence on Commission Act 1995 Legislation Cited: Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence in Civil and Commercial Matters 1970 Evidence on Commission Act 1995 (NSW), ss 32, 33 Cases Cited: British American Tobacco Australian Services Ltd v Eubanks for the United States of America and Ors [2004] NSWCA 158; 68 NSWLR 483 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Attorney-General (Plaintiff) (Ex Parte) Representation: Counsel: G Moore (Plaintiff)
Solicitors: NSW Crown Solicitor (Plaintiff) File Number(s): 2016/00226142 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate