NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: JCB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Mangion [2016] NSWCATAP 180 Hearing dates: 20 July 2016 Date of orders: 10 August 2016 Decision date: 10 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Hennessy LCM, Deputy President A Boxall, Senior Member Decision: 1. Leave is granted for the appellant to be represented by Stanford Law Firm. 2. Leave is granted for the respondent to be represented by P Batley. 3. Leave is refused for the appeal to be made on grounds other than a question of law. 4. The appeal is dismissed. 5. The Principal Registrar is to pay to the respondent $13,055.35 being the amount paid to the Tribunal by the Appellant pursuant to an order made on 9 June 2016. Catchwords: APPEAL – Australian Consumer Law - reasonable costs incurred by the consumer in having a vehicle repaired – adequacy of reasons - duty to refer to relevant evidence – duty to provide reasons for failing to refer to relevant evidence Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law, cll 54, 259 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 62(3), s 80(2)(b) Cases Cited: Beale v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Khan v Kang [2014] NSWCATAP 48 Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725 Resource Pacific Pty Ltd v Wilkinson [2013] NSWCA 33 Category: Principal judgment Parties: JCB Enterprises Pty Limited t/as Beautcars (Appellant) Gavin Mangion (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Batley (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate