NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kitoko v Mirvac Real Estate Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 201 Hearing dates: 20 June 2016 Date of orders: 15 August 2016 Decision date: 15 August 2016 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1] Sackville AJA at [2] Garling J at [3] Decision: (1) Notice of Motion filed 29 February 2016 dismissed. (2) Appeal dismissed. (3) Appellant to pay the respondents' costs. Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – personal injury – where appellant collided with glass sliding door – where CCTV footage of the collision was tendered at trial – where expert witness gave conflicting evidence regarding the CCTV footage – whether the primary Judge erred in rejecting the appellant's factual account of the collision – whether the primary Judge erred in giving weight to the CCTV footage – whether the primary Judge erred in his assessment of damages
APPEAL – civil – Notice of Motion seeking leave to adduce further evidence on appeal – whether there are grounds for adducing the further evidence Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 Cases Cited: Not Applicable Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Vangu Kitoko (Appellant) Mirvac Real Estate Pty Ltd (1st Respondent) Access Group Solutions (Australia) Pty Ltd (2nd Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Appellant) D Benson (1st Respondent) S Glascott (2nd Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate