NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Darby v R [2016] NSWCCA 164 Hearing dates: 2 November 2015 Date of orders: 11 August 2016 Decision date: 11 August 2016 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Rothman J at [2] Bellew J at [207] Decision: (1) Appeal be allowed in part; (2) The conviction of the Appellant, Glen Paul Darby, on Count 9, indecent assault, contrary to s 61L of the Crimes Act 1900, be set aside and the conviction quashed; (3) The Court direct a judgment and verdict of acquittal of the Appellant on Count 9; (4) The sentence imposed upon the Appellant be set aside and in lieu thereof an aggregate sentence be imposed of imprisonment for three (3) years and six (6) months with a non-parole period of one (1) year and nine (9) months. (5) The sentence commence on 11 August 2016, the non-parole period shall conclude on 10 May 2018 and the head sentence conclude on 10 February 2020. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – conviction – verdicts of guilty and not guilty to different counts – question of inconsistency and unreasonable verdict – issue of unreasonableness must factor in acquittals – appeal allowed in part. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Banditt v R [2005] HCA 80; (2005) 224 CLR 262 Black v The Queen [1993] HCA 71; (1993) 179 CLR 44 Jones v The Queen [1997] HCA 12; (1997) 191 CLR 439 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487 MacKenzie v The Queen [1996] HCA 35; (1996) 190 CLR 348 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; (2002) 213 CLR 606 Osland v The Queen [1998] HCA 75; (1998) 197 CLR 316 PA v R [2015] NSWCCA 18 R v Hemsley (1988) 36 A Crim R 334 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 R v O'Meagher (1997) 101 A Crim R 196 R v Randall (1991) 53 A Crim R 380 R v Zorad (1979) 2 NSWLR 764 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; (2011) 243 CLR 400 TK v R [2009] NSWCCA 151; (2009) 74 NSWLR 299 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Glen Paul Darby (Appellant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: T Game SC/L C Hutchison (Appellant) J Pickering SC (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate