NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hollaway [2016] NSWCCA 166 Hearing dates: 8 August 2016 Decision date: 12 August 2016 Before: Payne JA at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; Adamson J at [45] Decision: Crown appeal against sentence dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal against sentence – attempt to intentionally choke – s 37(1) of the Crimes Act – where offence committed whilst on parole – non-parole period substantially concurrent with service of balance of parole - no error in backdating sentence where parole revoked solely because of index offences – no failure to adequately consider the protection of the community or specific deterrence where previous violent offending occurred in significantly different circumstances – sentence not manifestly inadequate – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 23A, 37(1), 195 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) s 14 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 24, 47 Cases Cited: Barnes v R [2014] NSWCCA 224 Callaghan v R [2006] NSWCCA 58; 160 A Crim R 145 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Hollaway [2013] NSWSC 218 Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Applicant) Karyna Hollaway (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr H Baker (Crown) Ms A Francis with Mr Chhabra (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate