NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Layt v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1107 Hearing dates: 17 June 2016 Date of orders: 12 August 2016 Decision date: 12 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: (1) Amended Summons filed 17 June 2016 dismissed. (2) Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – review by Medical Assessment Service Review Panel of original medical assessment – where plaintiff claimed to suffer Post‑Traumatic Stress Disorder with Major Depressive Disorder as a result of a motor vehicle accident – whether the Review Panel failed to take into account a relevant consideration – whether the Review Panel breached the rules of natural justice – whether the Review Panel failed to address a substantive claim arising on the evidence – whether the Review Panel committed jurisdictional error Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Cervantes [2002] NSWCA 244; (2002) 24 NSWCCR 101 Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58; (1995) 184 CLR 163 Frost v Kourouche [2014] NSWCA 39; (2014) 86 NSWLR 214 Rodger v De Gelder [2015] NSWCA 211; (2015) 71 MVR 514 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak [2013] HCA 43; (2013) 252 CLR 480 Texts Cited: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th Edition) Guidelines for the Assessment of the Degree of Permanent Impairment 2007 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Brendan Kane Layt (P) Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd (1D) State Insurance Regulatory Authority (2D) A Review Panel appointed by the Motor Accident Authority (3D) Representation: Counsel: G T Johnson SC/D Epstein (P) M Robinson SC/J Gumbert (1D) Submitting (2D) Submitting (3D)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate