NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Paul Edward Dumas [2016] NSWDC 165 Hearing dates: 10 August 2016 Decision date: 12 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Mahony SC DCJ Decision: Full-time custodial sentence. For orders see [47] Catchwords: Supply prohibited drug; indictable quantity of heroin Legislation Cited: Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1986 Cases Cited: Fitzpatrick v R [2010] NSWCCA 26 Pearce v R (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Wong [1999] NSWCCA 420 Veen v R No. 2 (1998) 164 CLR 465 Category: Sentence Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Paul Edward Dumas (Offender) Representation: Counsel:
B Queenan (Crown) R Jankowski (Offender)
File Number(s): 15/208928 Publication restriction: Nil
REMARKS ON SENTENCE 1. The offender was committed for sentence on 3 November 2015 from Taree Local Court. He entered a plea of guilty at the earliest opportunity to one count of supply prohibited drug of greater than indictable quantity, namely, heroin, pursuant to s 25(1) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1986 ("DMTA"). 2. The offence carries a maximum penalty of 15 years imprisonment and/or 2,000 penalty units. The offender has also asked that three drug possession charges be dealt with on a Form 1. 3. The offender has spent one month and 27 days in custody since his arrest on 16 July 2015.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate