NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Montenegro [2016] NSWCA 211 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 16 August 2016 Before: Meagher JA; Leeming JA Decision: 1. Leave to appeal dismissed. 2. No order as to costs. Catchwords: APPEAL – application for leave – where question proposed in appeal whether respondent a "fit and proper" person – where same question addressed by this court in its original jurisdiction and decided adversely to respondent – whether any utility in public interest in appeal proceeding – leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s 108 Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), Pt 2.2 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 48(2)(k), 101(2)(r) Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Pt 65A, r 2 Cases Cited: Coles v Wood [1981] 1 NSWLR 723 Re Lonhro PLC [1990] 2 AC 154 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Montenegro [2015] NSWCA 409 Montenegro v Law Society of NSW [2015] NSWSC 867 Montenegro v Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales [2016] HCASL 36 Wenkart v Pantzer (No 3) (2004) 135 FCR 422 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (Applicant) Cesar Dario Montenegro (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C A Webster SC with P A Maddigan (Applicant) Cesar Dario Montenegro (self represented) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate