NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Campbell v R [2016] NSWCCA 170 Hearing dates: 1 July 2016 Date of orders: 17 August 2016 Decision date: 17 August 2016 Before: Payne JA at [1] McCallum J at [2] Wilson J at [45] Decision: Leave to appeal refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – sentencing – whether sentencing judge failed to give effect to finding of special circumstances – whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 33, 33(1)(b), 35(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21A(2), 44(1), 44(2), 54A Cases Cited: Barbaro v R; Zirilli v R [2014] HCA 2; 253 CLR 58 Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 Deng v R [2007] NSWCCA 216 Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 El-Almad v R [2015] NSWCCA 65 Makarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Pearson v R [2002] NSWCCA 428 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Richard Campbell (applicant) Crown (respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Higgins (applicant) S Dowling SC, L Coleman (respondent)
Solicitors: N Velcic (applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (respondant) File Number(s): 2013/96443 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Date of Decision: 2 April 2015 Before: Bennett DCJ File Number(s): 2013/96443
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate