NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sullivan v R [2016] NSWCCA 172 Hearing dates: 4 July 2016 Decision date: 17 August 2016 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Basten JA at [2]; Simpson JA at [28] Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal.
(2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – sentence appeal – aggregate sentence for two counts of robbery with offensive weapon – whether applicant's mental state relevant in determining objective gravity of offending – whether undue weight on specific deterrence given applicant's mental illness – whether erroneous application of guideline judgment in R v Henry Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 44 Cases Cited: R v Harris [2011] NSWCCA 105 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 Regina v Kelly [2010] NSWCCA 259 Turner v R [2011] NSWCCA 189 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Aaron John Sullivan (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr W Hunt / Ms C O'Neill (Applicant) Mr E Balodis (Respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/161924 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 11 June 2015 Before: Syme DCJ File Number(s): 2014/161924
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate