NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Lee (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1131 Hearing dates: 9 August 2016 Date of orders: 09 August 2016 Decision date: 09 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: (1) The defendants are to file all evidence in support of their s 31 exclusion application by 4 October 2016. (2) Should the defendants elect not to proceed with the s 31 application, they are to notify the plaintiff on or before 4 October 2016. (3) List for directions before Common Law Case Management Registrar at 9 am on 11 October 2016 to confirm compliance with these orders, make directions for the filing of plaintiff's evidence in response and fix a date for the hearing of the s 31 application. (4) Set aside the costs order pronounced on 1 July 2016 (order 3). (5) The costs of the parties before me are costs in the cause. Catchwords: PROCEEDS OF CRIME – Applications for exclusion from restraining orders – Applications for forfeiture orders – whether forfeiture applications should be determining before the applications for exclusion from the restraining orders INTERPRETATION – construction of instruments – federal legislation – application of Victorian Court of Appeal authority which contradicts New South Wales Court of Appeal obiter Legislation Cited: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), ss 19, 29, 49, 77 Cases Cited: Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) [1993] HCA 6; 176 CLR 300; Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Vo [2015] NSWSC 1523; Commissioner for Australian Federal Police v Zhang (Ruling No 1) [2015] VSC 390; 298 FLR 128; Commissioner for Australian Federal Police v Zhang [2016] VSCA 171; Elliott v R [2007] HCA 51; 234 CLR 38; Farah Constructions Pty Limited v Say-Dee Pty Limited [2007] HCA 22; 230 CLR 89; Lee v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2009] NSWCA 347; 75 NSWLR 581 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff) Fatt Wai Lee, Saw Hoon Loh and Kai Wen Lee (Defendants) Representation: Counsel: S Clemmett (Plaintiff) C Juebner (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate