NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AK v R [2016] NSWCCA 175 Hearing dates: 17 February 2016 Decision date: 22 August 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Adams J at [15]; Fullerton J at [50] Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – rejection of evidence at trial – whether miscarriage of justice had occurred requiring a re-trial – appellant convicted of 17 counts of sexual offences of various kinds against his step-daughter – prosecution case almost entirely dependent on evidence of complainant – appellant sought to lead evidence from a gynaecologist that it was unlikely that the complainant was pregnant at a particular point in time – evidence rejected as irrelevant – issue whether evidence should have been admitted – by a majority appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v V (1998) 100 A Crim R 488 Palmer v The Queen Palmer v R [1998] HCA 2; 193 CLR 1 Washer v The State of Western Australia [2007] HCA 48; 234 CLR 492 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AK (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Game SC (Appellant) S Dowling SC (Respondent)
Solicitors: Mills Oakley Lawyers (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/217459; 2012/336344 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 14 November 2014 Before: Hock DCJ File Number(s): 2012/217459; 2012/336344
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate