NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Russo & Ors v Russo & Ors (No. 4) [2016] NSWSC 1133 Hearing dates: 16 August 2016 Date of orders: 16 August 2016 Decision date: 16 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Lump sum costs order made. Judgment for the plaintiff against the third defendant for costs in the sum of $345,000.31. Catchwords: COSTS - application for a specified gross sum costs order ("a lump sum costs order") against the third defendant pursuant to Civil Procedure Act, s 98(4)(c) - previous costs orders made against third defendant - lengthy and complex litigation - third defendant is impecunious - whether the Court should make a lump sum costs order - whether the successful party may be disadvantaged by a formal costs assessment. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c) Cases Cited: Hamod v New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 Harvey v Barton (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 809 Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] NSWCA 121 Russo v Russo [2015] NSWSC 17 Russo v Russo (No. 2) [2015] NSWSC 449 Russo v Russo (No. 3) [2015] NSWSC 1849 Category: Costs Parties: First plaintiff: Angelo Phillip Russo Second plaintiff: Rosemary Russo Third defendant: John Russo Representation: Plaintiffs: David Matthew Farrar, Farrar Lawyers Third defendant: John Russo File Number(s): 2011/280915 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate