NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gittany v R [2016] NSWCCA 182 Hearing dates: 10 June 2016 Decision date: 19 August 2016 Before: Basten JA at [1]; R A Hulme J at [118]; Fagan J at [119] Decision: (1) To the extent necessary, grant the applicant leave to appeal under s 5(1) of the Criminal Appeal Act.
(2) Dismiss the applicant's appeal against conviction. Catchwords: APPEAL – criminal conviction – leave to appeal – challenge to findings in judge-alone trial – assessment of expert evidence as to reliability of eye-witness testimony – whether verdict unreasonable
CRIME – murder – leave to appeal conviction – judge- alone trial – expert evidence on witness testimony and memory contamination – whether error in discounting evidence of expert witness – whether failure to assess reliability of evidence of key witness
EVIDENCE – expert evidence – forensic psychology – reliability of witness' memory – expert evidence on phenomenon of unconscious contamination of perceptions by subsequently acquired information and internal processes of reconstruction – whether reasoning as to contamination based on misunderstanding of witness' evidence – whether evidence of post-event information supported theory of witness' memory contamination – whether delay in giving of witness' account supported contention of contamination Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 133 Cases Cited: Filippou v The Queen [2015] HCA 29; 89 ALJR 776 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Simon Gittany (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Odgers SC/Ms A Francis (Applicant) Ms S Dowling SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate