NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Cummins Equipment Hire Pty Limited [2015] NSWSC 2085 Hearing dates: 22 June 2015 Date of orders: 22 June 2015 Decision date: 22 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Claim for relief in paragraph 1 of originating process summarily dismissed; leave granted to amend originating process. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – application to set aside creditor statutory demand – summary dismissal – where originating process served interstate on registered office and on nominated address for service – whether originating process validly served under (CTH) Service and Execution of Process Act 1992 – absence of prescribed notice of service from process when served – held, no effective service of application to invoke jurisdiction – whether compliance with (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 sufficient for service – exclusion of UCPR by SEPA, s 8A – whether creditor estopped from denying validity of service – held, application summarily dismissed.
PROCEDURE – leave to amend originating process – held, leave granted. Legislation Cited: (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 459E, s 459G (CTH) Service and Execution of Process Act 1992, s 8A, s 9, s 9(1), s 15, s 16 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 10.3, r 10.3(3), r 10.6(1) Cases Cited: Elan Copra Trading Pty Limited v JK International Pty Limited [2005] SASC 501; (2005) 226 ALR 349; 56 ACSR 416; 195 FLR 229 Energy Conservation System Pty Limited v Downer EDI Engineering Electrical Pty Limited [2008] NSWSC 1139; (2008) 221 FLR 293 In the matter of International Materials & Technologies Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 787 Re Marlan Financial Services Pty Ltd; Marlan Financial Services Pty Ltd v New England Agricultural Traders Pty Ltd [1999] VSC 435; (1999) 33 ACSR 259; (1999) 158 FLR 256 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Cummins Equipment Hire Pty Ltd (ACN 154 398 339) (plaintiff/respondent) Phenix Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 102 604 008) (defendant/applicant) Representation: Counsel: J Baird (plaintiff/respondent) J Brown (defendant/applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate