NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gilles v Palmieri [2016] NSWCA 219 Hearing dates: 19 July 2016 Decision date: 23 August 2016 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; Sackville AJA at [41] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal.
2. Dispense with the requirements to file and serve a notice of appeal.
3. Appeal allowed in part.
4. Set aside order 5 made on 4 December 2015, and in lieu thereof order that the plaintiffs pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings (including the costs of the notices of motion filed on 16 September 2015 and 27 October 2015).
5. Otherwise dismiss the appeal.
6. The appellants pay the respondents' costs of the appeal (including the application for leave to appeal). Catchwords: PROCEDURE – service of originating process – extension of time – statement of liquidated claim filed almost six years after tax invoices had been rendered – service not effected until some nine months later – primary judge refused to grant an extension of time for service – whether primary judge failed to give reasons – whether primary judge erred in considering there was no power to extend time, or in the exercise of discretion – whether on appeal an order should be made extending time in circumstances where there had not been a full explanation for the delay, and aspects of the explanation were unsatisfactory Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 57, 58, 59 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 47 Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s 355 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 1.12, 6.2 Cases Cited: ACES Sogutlu Holdings Pty Ltd (in liq) v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] NSWCA 402; 89 NSWLR 209 AK v Western Australia [2008] HCA 8; 232 CLR 438 Arthur Andersen Corporate Finance Pty Ltd v Buzzle Operations Pty Ltd (in liq) [2009] NSWCA 104 Laurie v Carroll (1958) 98 CLR 310 Pritchard v DJZ Constructions Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 413 Wakim v Coleman [2010] NSWCA 221 Weston in Capacity as Special Purpose Liquidator of One.Tel Ltd (in liq) v Publishing and Broadcasting Ltd [2012] NSWCA 79; 88 ACSR 80 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joseph John Gilles (First Applicant) Gregory George Eliades (Second Applicant) Vince Palmieri (First Respondent) DJZ Constructions Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: IE Davidson SC, L Hulmes (Applicants) BM Green (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate