NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Presta (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1154 Hearing dates: 12 August 2016 Date of orders: 22 August 2016 Decision date: 22 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: Pursuant to s 17(1)(a) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), the defendant is made subject to a high risk offender extended supervision order for a period of 5 years from today and, pursuant to s 11 of the Act, the defendant is directed to comply with the conditions set out in the Schedule to this order. Catchwords: CIVIL LAW – high risk sex offender – final hearing – application for a continuing detention order – interim detention order in place – whether adequate supervision will be provided by an extended supervision order Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Anderson v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 86 Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Hayter [2007] NSWSC 983 Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Tillman [2007] NSWCA 119 Lynn v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 57 R v Presta [2000] NSWCCA 40 State of New South Wales v Bruno Presta (NSWSC, 5 August 2016, unrep) State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWCA 280 State of New South Wales v Presta [2016] NSWSC 966 State of New South Wales v Thomas (Preliminary) [2011] NSWSC 118 The State of New South Wales v Bruno Presta (NSWSC, 24 May 2016, unrep) Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Bruno Presta (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr L Fernandez (Plaintiff) Ms A Cook (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate