NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: White v R [2016] NSWCCA 190 Hearing dates: 4 July 2016 Decision date: 24 August 2016 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Basten JA at [10]; Simpson JA at [43] Decision: (1) The time in which to seek leave to appeal extended to 17 February 2016; (2) Leave to appeal against sentence granted; (3) Appeal allowed: the applicant be re-sentenced on the offence of armed robbery committed on 8 June 2013, taking into account the offence of armed robbery committed on 7 June 2013, to imprisonment made up of a non-parole period of 3 years and 6 months commencing on 19 June 2014 and expiring on 18 December 2017, with a balance of term of 2 years expiring on 18 December 2019. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for leave to appeal against sentence – robbery with offensive weapon – plea of guilty – further offence of robbery with offensive weapon taken into account on Form 1 – concession by defence counsel that offences committed "in company" – whether error in taking into account offences committed in company as an aggravating factor – Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), 21(2)(e) – error established – whether failure to give effect to finding of special circumstances justifying departure from statutory ratio of non-parole period – no error established – whether sentence was manifestly excessive due to error in approach to totality principle and failure to take into account delay
CRIMINAL LAW – failure by defence counsel to raise arguments before sentencing judge – Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44; 223 A Crim R 460 – whether failure precludes intervention – justice demands intervention – leave to appeal granted – appeal allowed – applicant re-sentenced
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate