NSW Caselaw
Children's Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: DFaCS re Eggleton [2016] NSWChC 4 Hearing dates: 9 June 2016 Date of orders: 06 July 2016 Decision date: 06 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Care and protection Before: Judge Peter Johnstone, President of the Children's Court of New South Wales, at Kempsey Decision: There is a realistic possibility of restoration to the parents; Secretary's assessment not accepted; Secretary directed to prepare a different permanency plan involving restoration Catchwords: CHILDREN – Care and protection – realistic possibility of restoration – permanency planning Legislation Cited: Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 Cases Cited: Blinko v Blinko [2015] FamCAFC 146 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34 DFaCS re Day [2012] NSWChC 14 DFaCS re Oscar [2013] ChC 1 Director-General of Department of Community Services; Re "Sophie" [2008] NSWCA 250 In the matter of Campbell [2011] NSWSC 761 JL v Secretary, Department of family and Community Services [2015] NSWCA 88 Johnson v Page [2007] FamCA 1235 Lukeson v Page [2007] Fam CA 1235 M v M [1988] HCA 68 Napier v Hepburn [2006] FCA 1316 Re Georgia and Luke (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 1387 Re Henry; JL v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2015] NSWCA 89 Re Tanya [2016] NSWSC 794 Sudath v Health Care Complaints Commission [2012] NSWCA 171 Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services NSW (DFaCS) The Mother and Father The Child Representation: Mr T Fox, solicitor, for the Secretary Mr R Hetherington, solicitor, for the parents Ms F Healey, solicitor, for the child File Number(s): 2016/11 Publication restriction: Pseudonyms have been used in order to anonymise the children and parties
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate