NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Stanford, Marcus [2016] NSWSC 1174 Hearing dates: 23 August 2016 Decision date: 24 August 2016 Before: R A Hulme J Decision: Imprisonment for a fixed term of 1 year 3 months Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – accessory after the fact to murder – factors relevant to assessment of seriousness of offence – murder of extreme seriousness but acts of accessory limited - Crown acceptance offence towards lower end of range – plea of guilty and other mitigating factors – no practical utility in allowing parole period – fixed term sentence imposed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 349(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 3A Cases Cited: R v Cowen [2008] NSWSC 104 R v Dileski [2002] NSWCCA 345; 132 A Crim R 345 R v Do (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 7 May 1997, unrep) R v Farroukh and Farroukh (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 29 March 1996, unrep) R v Faulkner [2000] NSWSC 944 R v Gersteling [2004] NSWSC 502 R v Johnson [2014] NSWSC 1254 R v Mirad [2004] NSWSC 701 R v Phan [2001] NSWSC 1069; 126 A Crim R 257 R v Quach [2002] NSWSC 1205 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina Marcus Stanford Representation: Counsel: Mr P Kerr (Crown) Mr B Neild (Offender)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions Catherine Hunter File Number(s): 2015/167544
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate