NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Veroc Pty Ltd v Evaross Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 189 Hearing dates: 23 May 2016 Date of orders: 25 August 2016 Decision date: 25 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A Coleman SC, Senior Member S Thode, Senior Member Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) Order 6 of the Tribunal in proceedings HB 13/62098 and HB 14/36216 ("the Tribunal Proceedings") is vacated. (3) Order 1(a) of the Appeal Panel dated 19 April 2016 be varied so that the final instalment payment of $21,884.00 shall be paid forthwith to the respondent out of the money held, pursuant to order 5 on 21 May 2016 in the Tribunal Proceedings, in the trust account of Peter Merity Solicitor Pty Limited. (4) The balance of the money held pursuant to Order 5 made on 21 May 2015 in the Tribunal Proceedings, in the trust account of Peter Merity Solicitor Pty Limited, being $2,047.28, be paid forthwith to the Appellant. (5) If either party wishes to make submissions with respect to costs of the appeal, they should file and serve written submissions, no longer than 5 pages, within 14 days from the date of publication of these reasons. Catchwords: APPEAL: construction of Consent Orders; whether Tribunal functus officio; money order; whether Tribunal correctly construed Consent Orders Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013 Cases Cited: Alexander James Pty Ltd v Pozetu Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCATAP 228 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Minister for Immigration v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Veroc Pty Ltd – Appellant Evaross Pty Ltd – Respondent Representation: Counsel: Mr J Young – Appellant Mr Davie – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate