NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Cseszko [2016] NSWCATAP 194 Hearing dates: 8 August 2016 Date of orders: 08 August 2016 Decision date: 08 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Hennessy LCM, Deputy President Dr J Lucy, Senior Member Decision: 1. Orders 1 and 2 made on 11 March 2016 are set aside. 2. The matter is remitted to the Tribunal as originally constituted with the following directions: (a) the Tribunal is to re-determine the matter according to law and in accordance with the Appeal Panel's reasons; (b) the matter is to be re-determined without fresh evidence apart from any evidence of events or circumstances which have arisen since the hearing on 1 February 2016. 3. The remitted matter is listed for directions on 16 August 2016 at 10.30 am. Catchwords: APPEAL – Administrative Law – administrative review of decision by Commissioner of Police to revoke firearms licence – decision set aside and substituted with decision to suspend the licence – whether Tribunal has power to suspend – power of Tribunal under s 63 of the Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Legislation Cited: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 43 Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW), s 9, s 63 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW). s 30, s 80 Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), s 19, s 22, s 24, s 75 Firearms Regulation 2006 (NSW), cl 19 Cases Cited: Nevell v NSW Police Force [2016] NSWCATAD 45 Beale v GIO (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Texts Cited: Geoffrey Flick. Federal Administrative Law, Lawbook Co, Australia, 2007 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Appellant) Jason Cseszko (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Ginters (Appellant) D Shridhar (Respondent) Solicitors: Henry Davis York (Appellant) Adams & Partners Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): AP 16/17332 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Date of Decision: 11 March 2016 Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member File Number(s): 1510559
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate