NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Pentelow v Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd (ACN 114 524 724) trading as Bell Lawyers [2016] NSWDC 186 Hearing dates: 5 August 2016; further submissions to 17 August 2016 Date of orders: 25 August 2016 Decision date: 25 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Summons dismissed (2) Cost reserved, with liberty to apply Catchwords: COSTS – appeal under s 384 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) – Chorley exception – barrister retains solicitor and senior counsel to appear on her behalf – whether barrister litigant entitled to profit costs for work done by her in addition to work carried out on her behalf – held Chorley exception for solicitors acting for themselves should not be extended to barristers – notice of contention as to whether barrister litigant's costs were "costs payable" under the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – whether costs order in favour of barrister litigant made pursuant to s 75A Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) or s 98 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 3, 4, 98, 99 and Sch 1 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 55B Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s 384 Legal Profession Uniform Law 2014 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 75A and 76 Cases Cited: Ada Evans Pty Ltd v Santisi [2014] NSWSC 538 AJH Lawyers v Mathieson Nominees Pty Ltd [2015] VSC 37 Atlas v Kalyk [2001] NSWCA 10 Broadbent v Medical Board of Australia [2015] FCA 717 Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403; [1994] HCA 14 Croker v Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 124 FCR 286; [2002] FCA 1432 Dobree v Hoffman [1996] WAR 36 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89 Farkas v Northcity Financial Services Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1036 Finn v McIntosh (District Court of NSW, Johnstone DCJ, 23 December 2010, unreported) Fong v Chan (1999) 46 OR (3d) 330, [1999] OJ No 4600 George v Fletcher (Trustee) (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 71 Guss v Veenhuizen (No 2) (1976) 136 CLR 47 Hartford Holdings Pty Ltd v CP (Adelaide) Pty Ltd [2004] SASC 161 Hawthorn Cuppaidge & Badgery v Channell (1992) 2 Qd R 488 Hunter v City of Joondalup [2016] WASC 444 Khan v Lord Chancellor [2003] 1 WLR 2385 Khera v Jones [2006] NSWCA 85 Kuny v Beamish [2003] MJ No 97, [2003] MBQB 47 London Scottish Benefit Society v Chorley, Crawford and Chester [1884] 13 QBD 872 Malkinson v Trim [2003] 1 WLR 463 Malouf v Malouf [2006] NSWCA 83 McGuirk v UNSW [2010] NSWCA 104 McIlwraith v Ilkin (Costs) [2007] NSWSC 1052 McIlwraith v Ilkin [2008] NSWCA 11 Metwally v University of Wollongong (1985) 60 ALR 68 Milillo v Konnecke [2009] NSWCA 109 Muldoon v Church of England Homes Burwood (2011) 80 NSWLR 282 Murphy v Arnoldus-Lewis [2009] NSWCA 142 Murphy v Legal Services Commissioner (No 2) [2013] QSC 253 Pentelow v Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd trading as Bell Lawyers [2013] NSWSC 111 Pentelow v Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd trading as Bell Lawyers (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 288 Pritchard Englefield (a firm) and Another v Steinberg (Supreme Court Costs Office, Master Rogers, 27 March 2003) R v Boswell, R v Halliwell [1987] 2 All ER 513 R v Stafford Stone and Eccleshall Magistrates' Court, ex parte Robinson [1988] 1 All E R 430 Radich v Kenway [2014] QDC 60 Rockcote Enterprises Pty Ltd v FS Architects Pty Ltd; Carelli v FS Architects Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 39 Santisi v New South Wales Bar Association [2006] NSWADT 4 Short v Crawley (No 45) [2013] NSWSC 1541 Soia v Bennett [2014] WASCA 27; (2014) 46 WAR 301 Von Reisner v Commonwealth (No 2) [2008] FCA 430 Waller v Freehills (2009) 258 CLR 67 Walsh v Bennetts (No 2) [2015] WASC 122 Wang v Farkas (2014) 85 NSWLR 390; [2014] NSWCA 29 Wang v Farkas (No 4) [2014] NSWCA 234 Wilkie v Brown [2016] NSWCA 128 Winn v Garland Hawthorn Brahe (Ruling No. 1) [2007] VSC 360 Worchild v Peterson [2008] QCA 26 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Janet Pentelow Defendant: Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd (ACN 114 524 724) trading as Bell Lawyers Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Mr L Robberds QC Defendant: Ms M Castle
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate