NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Temperzone Australia Pty Ltd v Amabile [2016] NSWSC 1197 Hearing dates: 10 August 2016 Date of orders: 30 August 2016 Decision date: 30 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hall J Decision: (1) The verdict entered for the defendant in Local Court proceedings 2015/156001 on 5 February 2016, is set aside.
(2) The order for costs in favour of the defendant made by the Local Court on 5 February 2016 is set aside.
(3) Judgment is entered in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant in the amount of $38,853.38 together with interest at the rate prescribed by the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 from 12 August 2013.
See [95] as to costs Catchwords: CONTRACT – appeal from Local Court decision – guarantee arising from a credit application – defendant/director of the company an experienced and sophisticated businessman – defendant separately signed as director of the company on the credit/supply contract and as guarantor
GUARANTEE – test to be applied in determining whether a binding contract of guarantee – defendant's wife filled out the contract – defendant did not read the document before signing – nature of the guarantee not specifically drawn to defendant's attention by plaintiff's sales engineer – no evidence of objective circumstances to support the contention that the defendant did not intend to enter into a contract of guarantee – no duty on behalf of the sales engineer to alert the defendant as to the guarantee and to the fact that the defendant should obtain legal advice – the signature of the defendant objectively manifested the fact that the defendant understood and intended to be bound by the terms and conditions of the guarantee – silence of the sales engineer did not amount to misleading and/or deceptive conduct Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2011 (Cth) Local Court Act 2007 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: B & L Linings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2008] NSWCA 187; 74 NSWLR 481 Druin Pty Ltd v Corbin [2014] NSWSC 510 Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc [2002] HCA 8; 209 CLR 95 Jaksic v Yim [2011] NSWSC 962 Kimberley NZI Finance Limited v Torero Pty Ltd (1989) ATPR 46-054 Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Limited [2010] HCA 31; 241 CLR 357 Petelin v Cullen [1975] HCA 24 at [12]; 132 CLR 355 Scottish Amicable Life Assurance Society v Reg Austin Insurances Pty Ltd (1985) 9 ACLR 909 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Temperzone Australia Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Mark Robert Amabile (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Sahade (Plaintiff) C Bolger (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate