NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: SS v R [2016] NSWCCA 197 Hearing dates: 16 May 2016 Date of orders: 02 September 2016 Decision date: 02 September 2016 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Schmidt J at [83]; Wilson J at [84] Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentencing – whether findings as to risks associated with assault available on the evidence – whether manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 53A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 59(1), 112(2) Cases Cited: Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2; 253 CLR 58 Bolt v The Queen [2012] NSWCCA 50 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; 249 CLR 571 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; 79 NSWLR 1 Hili v the Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Lowndes v The Queen [1995] HCA 29; 195 CLR 665 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Hamid [2006] NSWCCA 302; 164 A Crim R 179 Thompson-Davis v The Queen [2013] NSWCCA 75 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 YS v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 98 Category: Sentence Parties: SS (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Jauncy (Applicant) E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate