NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd v Roberts [2016] NSWCA 240 Hearing dates: 26 July 2016 Decision date: 02 September 2016 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Payne JA at [2]; Sackville AJA at [3] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Dismiss the appeal. 3. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal, including the application for leave to appeal. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – caveats – application by registered proprietor for an order that a caveat claiming a security interest in the land be withdrawn to enable the registered proprietor to refinance a first mortgage – registered proprietor disputes the validity of claimed security interest protected by the caveat – order made for withdrawal but allowing relodgement of caveat after refinancing – effect of order is to reduce registered proprietor's equity in the land – whether primary Judge erred in ordering withdrawal – whether discretion conferred by s 74MA of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) constrained by requirement that the case be "unusual" or "rare" before an order for withdrawal of a caveat can be made. Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), 74F, s 74G, s 74H, s 74J, s74K, s 74LA, s 74M, s 74MA, s 74O, s 74P, s 74Q, s 97(3) (repealed) Transfer of Land Act 1893 (WA), s 138 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 31.21 Cases Cited: Appleton Papers Inc v Tomasetti Paper Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 208 Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd [1968] HCA 1; 118 CLR 618 Black v Garnock [2007] HCA 31; 230 CLR 438 Brayson Motors Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1983) 57 ALJR 288 Buchanan v Crown and Gleeson Business Finance Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1465; 13 BPR 24,513 Custom Credit Corporation Ltd v Ravi Nominees Pty Ltd (1992) 8 WAR 42 Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd v Roberts [2016] NSWSC 989 Heid v Reliance Finance Corporation Pty Ltd [1983] HCA 30; 154 CLR 326 Heritage Properties (No.3) Pty Ltd v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd (1993) Q Conv R 54-448 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 J & H Just (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Bank of New South Wales [1971] HCA 57; 125 CLR 546 Jacobs v Platt Nominees Pty Ltd [1990] VR 146 Kerabee Park Pty Ltd v Daley [1978] 2 NSWLR 222 Martyn v Glennan [1979] 2 NSWLR 234 Navarac Pty Ltd v Moondancer Holdings Pty Limited [2009] WASCA 95 Oceanview Group Holdings v Balaz [2006] NSWSC 1469 Person-to-Person Financial Services Pty Ltd v Sharari [1984] 1 NSWLR 745 Tadrous v Tadrous [2009] NSWSC 407 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Appellant: Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd Respondent: Eleanor Therese Roberts Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate