NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mendonca v Chan & Naylor (Parramatta) Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 246 Hearing dates: 1 September 2016 Decision date: 01 September 2016 Before: Meagher JA at [1], [18], [20] and [22]; Leeming JA at [2] and [21] Decision: 1. Summons filed 8 July 2016 dismissed.
2. Notice of motion filed 8 August 2016 dismissed.
3. Application of Mr Gunning for costs dismissed.
4. Applicant to pay the respondent's costs on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL – extension of time – applicant unsuccessful as plaintiff in District Court seeking to recover bonuses from former employer – applicant then sued his barrister and solicitor seeking orders that they pay the costs ordered against him – those proceedings dismissed – leave to appeal from those proceedings refused – where premise of those proceedings was correctness of original District Court decision – applicant seeks extension of time, two years later, to appeal against original decision – where success on appeal would give rise to inconsistent judgments – whether sufficiently arguable proposed grounds of appeal demonstrated – leave to appeal refused Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Degmam Pty Ltd (in liq) v Wright (No 2) [1983] 2 NSWLR 354 Doppstadt Australia Pty Ltd v Lovick & Son Development Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 158 Mendonca v Chan & Naylor (Parramatta) Pty Ltd [2014] FCCA 1042 Mendonca v Chan & Naylor (Parramatta) Pty Ltd as Trustee for Chan & Naylor (Parramatta) Trust (District Court (NSW), 6 November 2015, unrep) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gerard Mendonca (Applicant) Chan & Naylor (Parramatta) Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant in person E W Young (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate