NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Templar v Watt (No 3) [2016] NSWSC 1230 Hearing dates: 25, 26, 27, 28 July 2016 Decision date: 02 September 2016 Before: McCallum J Decision: Verdict for the defendants Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defences – qualified privilege at common law and pursuant to the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) – where government-employed paediatric specialist wrote to department of education officer raising concerns as to the department's unqualified support for a business offering hearing tests in public schools for a fee – whether an occasion of qualified privilege – whether statements relevant to the occasion – whether conduct of author in publishing the matter complained of reasonable in the circumstances
CONSUMER LAW – email sent by government-employed paediatric specialist to department of education officer in relation to hearing tests offered in public schools by the plaintiffs – whether conduct in trade or commerce – consideration of extended definition of "trade or commerce" in the Australian Consumer Law Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), sch 2 Australian Consumer Law, s 236 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), s 30 Health Services Act 1997 (NSW), s 8 Cases Cited: Adam v Ward [1917] AC 309 Auswest Timbers v Secretary to the Department of Sustainability and Environment (2010) 241 FLR 360; [2010] VSC 389 Bashford v Information Australia (Newsletters) Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 366; [2004] HCA 5 Bride v The Shire of Katanning [2016] FCA 65 Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594; [1990] HCA 17 Firewatch v Country Fire Authority (1999) 93 FCR 520; [1999] FCA 761 Guise v Kouvelis (1947) 74 CLR 102; [1947] 13 Markit Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2007) 1 Qd R 253; [2006] QSC 157 Murphy v Victoria (2014) 45 VR 119; [2014] VSCA 238 Tame v New South Wales (2002) 211 CLR 317; [2002] HCA 35 TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Ilvariy Pty Ltd (2008) 71 NSWLR 323; NSWCA 9 Toben v Mathieson; Toben v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1530 Toben v Milne [2014] NSWCA 49 Unilan Holdings Pty Ltd v Kerin (1992) 35 FCR 272; [1992] FCA 211 Seafolly Pty Ltd v Madden (2012) 297 ALR 337; [2012] FCA 1346 Madden v Seafolly Pty Ltd (2014) 313 ALR 1; [2014] FCAFC 30 Texts Cited: Raymond E Brown, The Law of Defamation in Canada (2nd ed, Carswell) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stephen Templar (first plaintiff) Audametrics Pty Ltd (second plaintiff) Phillip Watt (first defendant) Central Coast Local Health District (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: MK Rollinson (plaintiffs) K Smark SC, S Chrysanthou (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate