NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Damevski v Hope [2016] NSWSC 1231 Hearing dates: 29 August 2016 Date of orders: 06 September 2016 Decision date: 06 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Pembroke J Decision: Summons dismissed Catchwords: FAMILY PROVISION – claim for additional provision by son and daughter-in-law of deceased – deceased died intestate FAMILY PROVISION – proceedings commenced out of time – whether sufficient cause for making an order extending the time for the making of the plaintiffs' application – sufficient cause not established EQUITY – equitable estoppel by encouragement alleged – whether the plaintiffs acted to their detriment in reasonable reliance EVIDENCE – caution required when relying on uncorroborated statements said to have been made by the deceased Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 Cases Cited: Sidhu v Van Dyke [2014] HCA 19 Steria Ltd v Hutchison [2007] ICR 445 Wilcox v Wilcox [2012] NSWSC 1138 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nick Damevski – first plaintiff Rada Damevski – second plaintiff Darko Damevski – third plaintiff Nada Hope – defendant Representation: Counsel: D Liebhold M Southwick
Solicitors: D Stanefska & Associates – for the first, second and third plaintiffs Grahame Howe & Co – for the defendant File Number(s): 2015/195212
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate