NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cornwell v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 255 Hearing dates: 10 August 2016 Decision date: 07 September 2016 Before: McColl JA at [1] Macfarlan JA at [2] Gleeson JA at [3] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal.
(2) Direct the applicant to file a notice of appeal in the form of the draft contained in the White Book within ten (10) days.
(3) Appeal dismissed with costs.
(4) Cross-summons seeking leave to cross-appeal be dismissed with costs. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defence – contextual truth – Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 26 – appeal from primary judge's refusal to strike out contextual imputation "the plaintiff is dishonest" – news item broadcast about plaintiff's links to illegal investment schemes – reference to plaintiff as casualty of ICAC inquiry into Liberal Party finances – whether contextual imputation unarguably bad – whether general contextual imputation carried "in addition to" other specific imputations complained of – whether primary judge misunderstood the effect of Fairfax Media Publications v Zeccola [2015] NSWCA 329 –whether general imputation of dishonesty at least arguably capable of arising
PROCEDURE – judgments and orders – interlocutory judgment – appeal against primary judge's ruling on strike-out application relating to contextual imputation – distinction between strike-out application under UCPR 14.28(1)(a) and determination of a separate question under UCPR r 28.1 – whether correct test applied by primary judge Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) ss 25, 26 Defamation Act 1974 (NSW) s 16 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 101 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 14.28, 14.31, 14.33 Cases Cited: Abou-Lokmeh v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 228 Bookbinder v Tebit [1989] 1 WLR 64 Corby v Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 227 Corby v Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 308 Cornwell v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1673 Dank v Rothfield [2015] NSWCA 193 Dank v Cronulla Sutherland District Rugby Football Club Ltd [2014] NSWCA 288 Fairfax Media Publications v Zeccola [2015] NSWCA 329 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 Re the Will of Gilbert (1946) 46 SR (NSW) 318 John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited v Jones [2004] NSWCA 205 Love v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1980] 2 NSWLR 112 Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 274 State of New South Wales v Deren [1999] NSWCA 22 State of New South Wales v Williams [2014] NSWCA 177 Younan v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 335 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Cornwell (Applicant) Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Seven Network (Operations) Limited (Second Respondent) Yahoo! Pty Limited (Third Respondent) James Thomas (Fourth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: KP Smark SC/ST Chrysanthou (Applicant) ATS Dawson/M Rabsch (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate