NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dominice v Allianz Insurance [2016] NSWSC 1241 Hearing dates: 31 August 2016 Date of orders: 31 August 2016 Decision date: 31 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Administrative Law Before: Fagan J Decision: 1. The summons is dismissed. 2. The plaintiff is to pay the defendants costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review of decision to refer application to panel of medical assessors – Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), s 63(3) – inconsistencies in clinical findings and observations – Permanent Impairment Guidelines 2007 (NSW), cl 1.43 – whether error of law on the face of the record arising from failure to consider whether medical assessment would have differed had inconsistencies been brought to claimant's attention – whether proper officer erred by considering non-compliance with cl 1.43 as cause for reasonable suspicion that medical assessment was incorrect in a material respect – whether precondition in s 63(3) is a jurisdictional fact – whether proper officer's decision was unreasonable
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – construction of Permanent Impairment Guidelines (NSW), cl 1.43 – purpose of assessor's duty to bring inconsistencies to claimant's attention – whether procedural fairness afforded by cl 1.43 limited to claimant's benefit Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) Permanent Impairment Guidelines 2007 (NSW) Cases Cited: Buck v Bavone (1976) 135 CLR 110; [1976] HCA 24 Elliott v Insurance Australia t/as NRMA Insurance [2014] NSWSC 1848 Frost v Kourouche [2014] NSWCA 39 Jaksic v Insurance Australia Ltd, trading as NRMA [2013] NSWSC 1141 Minister For Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Plaintiff M70/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2011) 244 CLR 144; [2011] HCA 32 QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Miller [2013] NSWCA 442 Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL (1999) 46 NSWLR 55; [1999] NSWCA 8 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jessye Dominice (Plaintiff) Allianz Australia Insurance trading as Allianz Insurance (1st Defendant) State Insurance Regulatory Authority (2nd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr Adrian Canceri (Plaintiff) Ms Jnana Gumbert (1st Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate