NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 6) [2016] NSWSC 1253 Hearing dates: 5 September 2016 Date of orders: 13 September 2016 Decision date: 13 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: (1) Leave is given to the First Defendant to file a Further Amended Cross-Claim in the form contained behind Tab 1 of the Court Book omitting paragraphs 25, 26, 27, particulars (i), (l) and (m) under paragraph 42 and the words "(and Mrs Sayed's interests)" in paragraph 42;
(2) The Further Amended Cross-Claim is to be filed within 14 days;
(3) The First Defendant is to pay the Plaintiff's costs of the application and the costs thrown away by reason of the amendment. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – amendment – further application to amend cross-claim – claim by mortgagor against mortgagee for exercise of power of sale – application to plead a further basis for breach of mortgagee's duty – breach if established would give mortgagee right against third parties – mortgagee out of time for bringing third party actions – mortgagee aware of facts forming basis for further claim for previous four years – no explanation for delay in seeking to amend – Civil Procedure Act s 58 – not just and reasonable to permit amendment
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – third party claims – third party not joint tortfeasors with defendant – Limitation Act 1969 – inter-relationship between ss 26 and 74 – whether defendant barred from making third party claim
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – postponement of the bar – fraud or mistake – third party claim by defendant for negligence and breach of contract - assertion of fraud or mistake on third parties' part by plaintiff – defendant not claiming fraud or mistake – negligence not equated with mistake – no postponement of the bar Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Pola [2013] NSWSC 1801 Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288 (2014) 254 CLR 185; [2014] HCA 36 Creevey v Barrois [2005] NSWCA 264 Hillebrand v Penrith Council [2000] NSWSC 1058 National Australia Bank Ltd v Sayed (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 420 National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 5) [2016] NSWSC 669 Nelson v Wyong Shire Council (1989) 68 LGRA 164 Scarcella v Lettice (2000) 51 NSWLR 302; [2000] NSWCA 289 Sinclair v Registrar-General [2010] NSWSC 173 Tekno Ceramics Pty Ltd v Zdenko Milat [2003] NSWCA 254 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: National Australia Bank Ltd (NAB) Bilal Sayed (Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: G Lucarelli (NAB/Cross-Defendant) In person (Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate