NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Helicopter Aerial Surveys Pty Ltd v Garry Robertson [2015] NSWSC 2104 Hearing dates: 15 December 2015 Date of orders: 16 December 2015 Decision date: 16 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Brereton J Decision: Orders for delivery, destruction and use of documents made. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – documents produced through voluntary disclosure – whether implied undertaking in Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 applies to documents produced in absence of order for discovery or other compulsory process – scope of implied undertaking – relevance of compulsion – attachment of undertaking where disclosure could have been obtained by compulsory process had it not been voluntarily provided – release from undertaking – implied undertaking subject to positive obligations to provide discovery or to answer subpoena – whether undertaking attaches to affidavits – whether affidavits sufficiently analogous to witness statements so as to attract undertaking – leave to use documents subject to undertaking for extraneous purposes – whether "special circumstances" or some good reasons warrant relief from undertaking. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 21.2, r 21.10 Cases Cited: Attorney-General (N.T.) v Maurice [1986] HCA 80; (1986) 161 CLR 475 Ainsworth v Hanrahan (1991) 25 NSWLR 155 Bourns Inc v Raychem Corporation [1999] 1 All ER 908 Bourns Inc v Raychem Corporation [1999] 3 All ER 154 Central Queensland Cement Pty Ltd v Hardy [1989] 2 Qd R 509 Crest Homes plc v Marks [1987] 1 AC 829 Esso Australia Resources Limited v The Honourable Sidney James Plowman [1995] HCA 19; (1995) 183 CLR 10 Global Medical Solutions Australia Pty Ltd v Axion Molecular Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 665 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; (2008) 235 CLR 125 Holpitt Pty Limited v Varima Pty Limited (1991) 29 FCR 576 Liberty Funding Pty Limited v Phoenix Capital Limited [2005] FCAFC 3; (2005) 218 ALR 283 Medway v Doublelock Ltd [1978] 1 WLR 710; [1978] 1 All ER 1261 Prime Finance Pty Limited v Randall [2009] NSWSC 361 Re Addstone Pty Ltd (in liq); Ex parte Macks (1998) 30 ACSR 156 Springfield Nominees Pty Ltd v Bridgelands Securities Limited (1992) 38 FCR 217 State Bank of South Australia v Smoothdale (No 2) Limited (1995) 64 SASR 224 State of New South Wales v McCarthy [2015] NSWSC 1780 Texts Cited: Edmund Robert Daniell, The Practice of the High Court of Chancery (4th ed) Wigmore on Evidence (1972, 4th ed, Chadbourn Revision) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Helicopter Aerial Surveys Pty Ltd (ACN 088 007 765) (plaintiff) Gary Robertson (defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Simpkins (plaintiff) G Robertson (in person) (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate