NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Barakat; R v Younes (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1255 Hearing dates: 07 September 2016 Decision date: 09 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: N Adams J Decision: The application by the accused David Younes to have evidence of questioning pursuant to s 14 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) excluded is refused. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – accessory after the fact to murder – application under s 138 of the Evidence Act 1900 (NSW) to exclude evidence said to be obtained improperly – where request made to owner of vehicle under s 14(1)(c) of LEPRA to disclose driver of vehicle – whether s 14(1)(c) permitted questions asked – whether accused ought to have been cautioned – evidence not obtained improperly – application refused
EVIDENCE – application to exclude an admission under s 90 of the Evidence Act 1900 (NSW) – whether it would be unfair to accused to use the evidence having regard to the circumstances in which the admission was made – no unfairness – application dismissed
WORDS AND PHRASES – "require" Legislation Cited: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 316, 349(1) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 90, 138 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 34 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW), ss 11, 14(1)(c), 17(1) Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Horwood (2009) 78 NSWLR 32; [2009] NSWSC 1447 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v Abuquta, Haytham [2011] NSWDC 12 R v Cornwell (2003) 57 NSWLR 82; [2003] NSWSC 97 R v Coulstock (1998) 99 A Crim R 143 R v Dalley [2002] NSWCCA 284 R v Director of Serious Fraud Office; Ex parte Smith [1993] AC 1 Robinson v Woolworths Limited (2005) 64 NSWLR 612; [2005] NSWCCA 426 X7 v Australian Crime Commission & Another [2013] HCA 29 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: David Younes Regina Representation: Counsel: G Stanton with M Fozzard (Accused Younes) D Dalton SC (Accused Barakat) P McGrath SC (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate