NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Smith v Acquire Asia Pacific Philippines Inc (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1285 Hearing dates: 8 September 2016 Date of orders: 08 September 2016 Decision date: 08 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: McDougall J Decision: Order defendant to join with plaintiffs to direct Escrow Agent to pay Escrow Amount to plaintiffs. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – freezing order – defendant seeks order freezing part of amount held in escrow until cross-claim is determined – whether there is a danger that a prospective judgment will be unsatisfied – whether evidence supports such a finding –Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 25.11 Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hua Wang Bank Berhad (2010) 80 ATR 449 Severstal Export GmbH v Bhushan Steel Ltd (2013) 84 NSWLR 141 Smith v Acquire Asia Pacific Philippines Inc [2016] NSWSC 1084 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Jonathan James Smith (First Plaintiff) Saffelberg Investments NV (Second Plaintiff) Richard Weatherstone (Third Plaintiff) Darcy Mark Lalonde (Fourth Plaintiff) Alvin Edillon (Fifth Plaintiff) Windy A Dolendo (Sixth Plaintiff) Acquire Asia Pacific Philippines Inc (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Elliott (Plaintiffs) I Pike SC / B Lim (Defendant)
Solicitors: Rankin Ellison Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Marque Lawyers Pty Ltd (Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/116860
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate