NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rahman v Attorney General of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 261 Hearing dates: 14 September 2016 Decision date: 19 September 2016 Before: Meagher JA; Payne JA Decision: 1. Dismiss the Summons seeking leave to appeal. 2. Order that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: APPEAL – application for leave – where orders made against applicant under Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) – where applicant seeks to appeal from those orders – where leave required by s 101(2)(r) of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) as no money or property in issue – where more than two year extension of time required for making of application for leave – where no material error identified or apparent in first instance judgment – where appeal sought to be pursued for misconceived and improper purpose of challenging validity of sequestration order made in earlier bankruptcy proceedings – where applicant previously sought leave to commence proceedings on the premise that existing orders correct – application dismissed Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 27, 43 Constitution, ss 51(xvii), 77 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 40 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(r) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.10 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), ss 8, 14 Cases Cited: Application of Mohammad Tabibar Rahman [2014] NSWSC 1161 Application of Mohammad Tabibar Rahman [2015] NSWSC 164 Clyne v New South Wales Bar Association (1960) 104 CLR 186 Mohammad Tabibar Rahman v Rosalind V Dubs [2013] HCASL 23 Mohammad Tabibar Rahman v Peter Blair & Ors [2015] HCASL 210 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Mohammad Tabibar Rahman (Applicant) Attorney General of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) D Galbraith (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate